XIDS - 2300 - Critical Philosophy of Race and Racism

Area E4: XIDS New Course Topic

completed

What can I do next?

View the Proposal

  • View changes to the proposal by clicking the Discussion tab and selecting "Show current with markup" on the User Tracking dropdown.
  • View current comments concerning this proposal by clicking the Discussion tab.
  • View the history of the proposal by clicking the Workflow Status tab.
  • View the signatures the proposal has collected by clicking the Signatures tab.
  • View the files associated with the proposal by clicking the Files tab.
  • Compare the proposal with related proposal by clicking the Proposal Lookup tab.
Introduction
  • Welcome to the University of West Georgia's curriculum management system. 

    Please TURN ON the help text before starting this proposal by clicking  next to the print icon directly above this message. 

    Your PIN is required to complete this process. For help on accessing your PIN, please visit here.

    The link to the shared governance procedures provides updates on how things are routed through the committees. Please visit  UWG Shared Governance Procedures for Modifications to Academic Degrees and Programs for more information.

    If you have any questions, please email curriculog@westga.edu.

  • Desired Effective Semester*
    Scroll to the bottom of the list and choose either Fall, Spring, or Summer.
    Desired Effective Year*
Contact Information
  • Primary Contact Name*
    Dr. Alex Feldman
    Dr. Alex Feldman
  • Email*
    afeldman@westga.edu
    afeldman@westga.edu
  • College (Select University College)*
Course Information
  • Course Prefix*
    Course Number*
    2300
    2300
  • Proposed Course Title*
    Critical Philosophy of Race and Racism
    Critical Philosophy of Race and Racism
    Must be 30 characters or less including spaces
  • The Social Sciences template requires the synthesis of at least two disciplines with the social sciences. Check the disciplines that your course includes:*
Your proposal will need to address the following issues:
  • Describe, holistically, the theme of the course.*
    This course is an introduction to critical philosophy and theory of race and racism. In the U.S. at present, it seems obvious in many contexts to classify people by race. What are we really talking about, though, when we talk about race? After all, it has not always seemed obvious to people in other times and places that the concept of race is a natural or relevant way to make sense of human differences. Indeed, are there really such things as races? What, if anything, does the word race refer to? Although race-thinking draws from older ways of understanding human difference, the modern idea of races as biologically-distinct groupings of human beings emerged only at the end of the eighteenth century. Indeed, the dominant view of scientists and scholars today is that there is no biological justification for distinguishing people into races (Eduard Macherey). How, then, did the race idea co me to seem such a self-evident way of understanding ourselves? If races are not real in a biological sense, do they perhaps have reality in a sociohistorical or political sense? We will investigate such questions about the metaphysics of race in Unit I of the course. In Unit II, we will explore the nature of the connection between racism and racialism (race-thinking) in world history since 1492, with a special focus (but not exclusive) focus on the United States. Our goal will be to understand the elements out of which and the processes whereby the race idea was formed. Finally, in Unit III, we will turn from metaphysical and historical questions to questions of an ethical, political, and existential character. What role should an understanding of racial identity play in antiracist political solidarity? How should we understand ourselves and our aspirations in light of the persistence of racism and racialism?
  • Describe the contribution of each of the disciplines.*
    1. Philosophy: philosophical questions about the metaphysics of race and the ethics of racialism and racism tie the different units of the course together. Readings will be drawn from both historical and contemporary work in philosophy of race. 2. History: a serious understanding of the race idea requires knowledge both of the history of racism and the history of race-thinking. The course will also introduce students to the notion of historicization--of what it means to treat race as a historically-specific, rather than eternal, mode of self-understanding. 3. Anthropology. Some of the most significant moves in the history of race-thinking occurred in anthropology. Moreover, anthropology was once a sub-discipline of philosophy (philosophical anthropology). We will read Kant's foundational work on the philosophical anthropology of race, as well as more recent work on the post-Boas response to race-thinking. 4. To expose students to social and artifactual (constructionist) theories of race, we will read some classical and contemporary sociology, as well as thinkers working at the intersection of philosophy and sociology (Du Bois).
    Description as you wish for it to appear in the catalog.
  • How does the text bring these perspectives together so that a true interdisciplinary focus is achieved?*
    The two main texts will be as follows: 1. Taylor, Paul C. Race: A Philosophical Introduction. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. 2. Shelby, Tommie. We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, 2005. Taylor opens his book with a focused discussion of the need for an interdisciplinary approach to philosophy of race, one that uses history and the social sciences in tandem with philosophy to grasp the social, political, and artifactual character of race. He also presents a helpful overview (complete with tables) of the main periods in the history of modern racialism. Shelby likewise argues that the problem of antiracist solidarity requires familiarity both with political philosophy and with the history of black thought on the subject. His book will show students how to extract cross-cutting themes from the tradition of black discussions of nationalism, amalgamation, integration, etc. He will also help students understand the importance of connecting normative philosophical reflection to specific historical contexts. Aside from these two books, I will use a number of articles from philosophy, anthropology, sociology, and history, as well as several short films (BBC, "Racism," 2007; Eduard Macherey's 2013 lecture "Are Races Biologically Real?" at Rutgers).
  • Discuss how students are required to integrate various disciplines' concepts and perspectives. How will assignments and text motivate students to learn?*
    In philosophy, students will have to master two conflicting positions in metaphysics, essentialism and nominalism, as well as distinctive positions in ethics, such as the debate between universalism and particularism (and how the history of race and racism forces a reworking of the current, largely Kantian framing of the problem). Students will also explore the appropriate basis for solidarity. Finally, we will explore classic questions at the intersection of moral psychology, ethics, and social theory that have to do with self-deception, double-consciousness, authenticity, and alienation. We will also explore meta-philosophical questions about the appropriate way to understand the project of political philosophy (Charles Mills). With respect to anthropology and sociology, students will be exposed, via the themes of race and racism, to classic questions about the nature-culture distinction, social construction, and social categorization. I will use short reading quizzes, a midterm, and a final to test students mastery of course readings and concepts. In addition, I will use a scaffolded four-part term paper that requires students to apply course concepts to a current issue. This kind of assignment will motivate students by giving them a chance, with recurring feedback, to connect what we are doing in the course to their own lives and concerns. It will also give them a chance to produce a higher-level synthesis of the different disciplinary perspectives they have encountered. Students will read from a mixture of classic and contemporary writers in philosophy and the social sciences. To engage students attention, I have also included two films, a three-part BBC miniseries on the global history of racism and a short lecture from Eduard Macherey debunking the idea that races are biologically real.
  • What, specifically, are the attainable and measurable learning outcomes for each student?
    1. Explain and critically assess rival philosophical theories of race and racism, with a special focus on race as a social construct, rather than a natural kind. 2. Identify and describe the major stages in the history of modern race-thinking and racism. 3. Discuss in both oral and written discourse one major debate in each of the following sub-areas of current philosophy of race: metaphysics of race, political philosophy of antiracist solidarity, and race and the study of self-knowledge. 4. Describe the views of at least three major philosophers of race and racism.
  • Describe any other requirements or conditions for the course.*
    N/A
  • Describe potential grading criteria (exams, papers, performances, works of art, etc.) Please list in numbered bullets.*

    Scaffolded term paper: applying course concepts to a contemporary issue. See sylalbus attached.

       
  • Potential Primary Reference(s) (text, current literature, etc.) Please list in a numbered bullets.*
    Shelby, Tommie. We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, 2005.
        Taylor, Paul C. Race: A Philosophical Introduction. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
        Additional short readings (see below)
  • Outline of Syllabus unless clearly provided in the attached syllabus. Please list in a numbered bullets, if applicable.*

    See syllabus.

  • REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS

    ATTACH any required files (e.g. syllabi, other supporting documentation) by navigating to the Proposal Toolbox and clicking  in the top right corner.

    1.) Syllabus

    Please ensure its the correct syllabus (e.g., correct course prefix and number, course title, learning objectives/outcomes and includes link to the Common Language for Course Syllabi: http://www.westga.edu/UWGSyllabusPolicies/

  • Syllabus*
  • User Tracking

    Help: Show Original: This option displays the proposal as it appeared at launch. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current: This option displays the proposal as it appears currently. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current with Markup: This option displays the proposal with all of its current content marked to show different editors. Text fields that include imported content are indicated by a blue highlight, and may also include additional changes within, indicated by each editor’s unique color. Fields containing selects, checkboxes, radio buttons, or widgets (such as the curriculum) provide an activity log above the field, indicating each editor’s selection and unique color.

    Comments

    You have not saved your changes to all the assessment fields you edited. You have the following options:

    • Click "Save All Changes" now to save every change you made
    • Click "Abandon Changes" to destroy all unsaved changes
    • Click "Cancel" to continue working on assessments and save each field individually

    What would you like to do?

      You must be logged in, in order to approve.

      Please upload the form that you just printed and signed.

      This will be used as your signature to sign this proposal upon approval.


      Listed below are the symbols and colors utilized in Curriculum:

      • = has not made a decision
      • = approved
      • = rejected
      • = held
      • = suspended
      • = cancelled
      • = multiple decisions
      • = task
      • = mine
      • = stuck
      • = urgent, out of date import source
      x

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}